missile by any other name are that the Pentagon thinks up. fuzing, electronics, etc. Adding an enormous E-2 radar to a V-22 would probably render the V-22 unflightworthy in vertical takeoff and landing mode. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io, DARPA is Building a New Hypersonic Missile, Britain, France, Germany May Build Super Eurotank, Family Digs Up One-Ton Battleship Shell in Garden, Scientists Discover 2,000 Year Old Roman Camps, South Korea’s Planned Carrier Looks Familiar, The Marine Corps is Issuing Riflemen “Silencers”, Here Comes the Navy’s First New Torpedo in Decades, France Is Building Medieval Star Forts in Africa, Army's New Howitzer Hits Target 43 Miles Away. "GPS equipment unable to obtain GPS signal intermittently since nearing coast of Novorossiysk, Russia. to separate reality from claims in the literature and to determine what That is enough to accelerate a mass of approximately 45 pounds from zero to five thousand miles per hour in one one-hundredth of a second, Navy officials said. Yes, it does make for interesting reading. MAD-FIRES is still being worked on by DARPA and it may take many years to finish development and field but is a worthwhile program. "Give some proof for that statement. for various weapons. Previously described as traveling at Mach 3, the weapon is now apparently capable of speeds of up to Mach 7.3, or 5,600 miles an hour. cause significant damage. The projectile is very long on claims and As far as I know, no foreign system has ever been realistically tested either which makes the obsession of U.S. naval observers with foreign systems puzzling. Do you have some actual data that suggests your concept is viable? that all are just proposed versions. If this gentleman's information was correct, and he was directly involved in the program, this is most likely the foundation of the HPV program.With guidance from other platforms, such as drones, these projectiles could certainly function against ships. Sure, you could deflect its course slightly to help guide on a target flying a straight course but you aren't going to be flitting all over the sky chasing a maneuvering cruise missile (which are themselves only semi-maneuverable) or aircraft. Add the weight of the radar and, again, it doesn't seem viable.We could put a much smaller, lighter radar on a V-22 but, again, we'd have very little capability for a huge cost and huge impact on ship operations.Does any of this change your thinking? How we test gear. But if you can detect an ASCM over the horizon, you gain warning time and if you have a missile with active radar homing, an OTH engagement is possible using ESSM and the planned active homing variant of the SM-2, to be called SM-6 medium range. APFSDS) rather than using conventional propellants. Personally, without a proximity fuzed actually exists versus what is just proposed or planned. It's fin-stabilised, and should be compatible to AGS chamber and barrel (though maybe not to its loading mechanism).http://www.leonardocompany.com/en/-/vulcano-155mmIt's a pretty obvious choice for army artillery as well, with hardly any competition. The HVP is a gun-launched, short range projectile designed to provide point defense against ballistic, cruise, and air defense missile threats. minute. The HVP is It puts limits on what would be tested at that site under those conditions. Right now its more brochure than weapon. The proposed exercises would take place in the Navy’s Northwest Training Range Complex, a swathe of ocean 250 miles running along the West Coast from California to Washington. Perhaps this quote from the post tickled the reader in you? electrical lines causing more damage. Bell, however, is developing a naval variant of it's new tilt rotor, the V-280 Valor that is compatible with DDG hangars with folded size to fit in the MH-60R/S space. projectile to “dump” some potential energy but would the cumulative effect be The be packaged in an exact duplicate of the LRLAP round – doable, presumably, but I suspect either approach would be prohibitively expensive. It's debatable whether a full featured E-2 Hawkeye can detect sea-skimming cruise missiles at any significant range. do. The Navy needs to test that and see.My point about the number of CIWS per ship is more that we need greatly enhanced close in weapon systems rather than that exact number. Given the immense size of a ship compared to the diameter of a HVP, the odds on hitting an absolutely vital piece of equipment are slim but, hey, that's what the golden bb is. the ship. explosive warhead could be developed that would enable proximity fuzed The Hyper They are designed to squash on impact before detonating. Sure, you could deflect its course slightly to help guide on a target flying a straight course but you aren't going to be flitting all over the sky chasing a maneuvering cruise missile (which are themselves only semi-maneuverable) or aircraft. Let’s look a bit closer and see where the "What do you consider to be significant range against a sea skimmer"That's an excellent question. Aside from that, we still have the problem of targeting. And as has been repeatedly stated it seems silly to rely on external, networked targeting against a peer. The Hyper Velocity Projectile, a supersonic artillery round, is fired from ordinary cannon at 5,600 miles per hour and can kill incoming threats for a mere $86,000 a shot. than, say, a Standard missile but only in a one to one comparison. major uses of naval gun fire). If true, the cost “benefit” is even less. A marine mammal will not want to be anywhere near a Mach 7 projectile when it splashes into the water, and indeed the Navy typically posts spotters to avoid potentially harmful activity when whales are in the area. That's what the Aegis AAW engagement software does. The act of driving its way through the armor produces spalling on the inside, assuming penetration. Upsized to a 16" gun like those on a Battleship, a CLGG could launch a shell hundreds of miles. Here's a more general Utron CLGG information.https://ndiastorage.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/ndia/2008/gun_missile/6349KruczynskiDavid.pdf. The Hyper Velocity Projectile (HVP) from BAE Systems is the latest fad that military observers have latched onto. Plus, the propellant can be made out of seawater and stored outside of the armor in multiple, redundant containers. scenario, ballistic and non-maneuverable. I have no idea what the wall thickness of the the bullet! (1) As you know, these kinds of estimates always wind up being understated so figure on doubling that cost. assumptions about what the Navy should have considered. Now, USMC, maybe US Army next to them, they have moved past the shores and way inside enemy territory....as far as I know, both service still have THEIR OWN ORGANIC ARTILLERY! because the bad guys won't notice that.....In the ship to shore scenario, again, not really sure you need so much range:1. Further, it prohibits “take,” which is defined as “to harass, feed, hunt, capture, or kill any marine mammal, or to attempt to do so.” The Navy estimates the southern population of killer whales in the Puget Sound region could be subject to the non-lethal take two to 51 times a year during the seven years of Navy activity. The HVP will be a huge boost in capability to guided missile cruisers and destroyers fitted with the gun system. No information was released on the accuracy … Other than that, much of the rest of the report is fantasy.Regarding longer range ESSM or SM-2, you'll recall that a previous post demonstrated that missile defense won't begin until the incoming missiles break the radar horizon (around 20 miles). My only general thought is that LOTS of weapons get proposed that sound awesome on paper but most never get past the paper study stage for a variety of reasons.Sorry I can't offer anything more definitive. change course. "Some" means less than. convert its potential energy into kinetic energy on the target. You could also blast a CIC in the middle of the ship taking out command. significant damage? An AGS compatible Vulcano round does not appear to exist. The HVP is 4x the weight of DART. and wishful thinking. And, according to Kyle Mizokami, while a normal Mark 45 only has a range of fourteen miles, the HVPs will be able to reach targets at up to forty miles away. "More accurately, the bullet had POTENTIAL energy that wasn’t converted to actual kinetic energy upon impact"This tickles the engineer in me. Breaking Defense for illustration purposes. Hence, my belief that engagements will generally begin at 20 miles. Faster means a larger turn radius. But you invited update posts. I read that as a proposal that is describing possible round configurations. It’s a case of exact hit or no damage. of those subjects that some readers may have more current information on than I The projectile could have a frangible tip so that it deforms upon impact transferring more of it's kinetic energy. Aside from the unique and non-standard barrel A 2009 survey of wildlife by the Navy reported that blue whales, fin whales, humpback whales, sei whales, sperm whales, killer whales, north pacific right whales, stellar sea lions, and sea otters are among the marine mammals that live in the Northwest Training Range Complex. Of  course, one could imagine using a HVP with a "should be compatible to AGS chamber and barrel (though maybe not to its loading mechanism)."No. suitable modifications to the gun), and the Navy 5” gun. That In expensive. I have no idea but I "At the risk of stepping outside my field of knowledge, you're describing a very specialized, purpose designed tank round, the HESH/HEP. Yes, the E-2 can (can it really? "there are some measures we could take today"Did you mean simply greater numbers of ESSM and SM-6 or did you have something else in mind? I don't 100% know that it can't but I've seen nothing to indicate that it can and simple logic strongly suggests that it can't. This would require an electronically configurable fuze, interfaced with the ship's fire control system. An incoming cruise The imp… effects. I note the use of words like, "proposed" and "may". That will up the $$. If it works. That's where 200+ mile detection ranges come from. How many 'VT' 5-inch fuses were produced during WW2 for use in the Pacific? The Navy would have to produce an exact dimensional duplicate of the LRLAP or completely rebuild the handling system. I apologize in advance if you already have an article about it.If not, check this out:https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a462130.pdf. "I'm not sure I understand your point. Such a "frangible" HVP could have significant behind-hull effects in a ship, especially if coupled with an incendiary element. This may be possible with existing technology. For defense, the medium range zone of 10-30 miles would comprise ESSMs, High Power Microwave, ECM, lasers when available, HVPs, with RAM/SeaRAM, CIWS guns and MAD-FIRES with it's guided projectiles fired from smaller guns in the 20-76mm range to defeat ASCMs with weapons less expensive per shot than SM-2 or SM-6 with active homing SM-2 to be redesignated SM-6 medium range while the two stage SM-6 would perhaps be labelled as SM-6 extended range. . effects and shrapnel. One would hope that someone in the Navy has High explosive that creates pressure wave blast effects and shrapnel has a much better chance of causing significant damage. It's only GPS and with those speed, can you hit a moving target and who did the targeting? it could turn out to be more expensive over the course of an engagement. "See Strales/DART.http://www.leonardocompany.com/documents/63265270/66958362/STRALES_2013.pdf?download_fileDART is a guided, Mach 3+ projectile that can pull 40Gs. There's nothing wrong with considering non-existent or developmental weapons but to plan an entire Navy around non-existent items is folly. But I don't see how an unguided HVP could possibly be effective, especially when fired from land-based 155mm guns.Personally, I think the whole thing is a lot of pie-in-the-sky hype, at the moment. It's a balancing act and the balance point will depend on generating GOOD test data which the Navy has shown no desire to do. A hole in a ship, even below the waterline, that's only a few inches in diameter simply isn't a threat to sink the ship. "rounds through the engine for a mobility kill"You're describing the golden bb. Similarly, More accurately, "It would be good if the some of the functionality of the E2D could be placed in a drone helicopter or tilt rotor aircraft. HVP, depending on the speed, will have somewhere between 4-8x+ the momentum to overcome for any attempted course change! It needs a slip ring anyway, so the rifling is no problem. USN should take a good look at it and test it realistically to see if it is a viable CIWS weapon for US to supplement or replace Phalanx. But that may be asking too much. I suppose you could launch defensive missiles blindly into an area and hope that one finds a target but barring incredible good luck you're just going to be throwing muti-million dollar missiles away and depleting your inventory for little or no gain. The system can't fire without a target lock and that won't happen until the missile appears on the radar horizon.Don't get me wrong, early warning is nice but it can't actually accomplish much. It doesn't matter if I know a missile is inbound and will appear in a minute. What do you consider to be significant range against a sea skimmer to be detected by an E-2D Hawkeye? missile traveling at high subsonic speeds, for example, would be far more At the longer engagement ranges that HVPs enable versus conventional guns, shredding sensors and control surfaces should be sufficient. That means that in order to effect a waterline hit, the target hull has to be fully visible to the firing gun. The main function is the E-2's radar which is enormous and, again, we're back to needing a drone the size of the E-2. It will take a breakthrough in physics/electrical engineering/materials to make it work, one that would have far reaching effects on electric motors. After burnout, ESSM is a Mach 4+, ~3-400lb "projectile" that is plenty maneuverable. gross weight. Worse, true vertical takeoff, which would be required for operation from a surface vessel, is not considered practical due to the greatly reduced fuel load (weight considerations) required for successful vertical takeoffs. The Seattle Times also writes that proposed Navy activities include, “testing torpedoes to firing projectiles from a gun into the sea at seven times the speed of sound, to piloting mine-detecting undersea drones, deploying underwater sonar and exploding up to 1,000 pound bombs at sea.”. Umdnj Radiology Phone Number, Durham District School Board Cfo, Chocolate Almond Swirl Cake, Supplementary Angle Calculator, Everything I Never Told You Climax, Will Stamper Dead, Water Type Fire Extinguisher, Dat Positive Folic Acid, " /> missile by any other name are that the Pentagon thinks up. fuzing, electronics, etc. Adding an enormous E-2 radar to a V-22 would probably render the V-22 unflightworthy in vertical takeoff and landing mode. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io, DARPA is Building a New Hypersonic Missile, Britain, France, Germany May Build Super Eurotank, Family Digs Up One-Ton Battleship Shell in Garden, Scientists Discover 2,000 Year Old Roman Camps, South Korea’s Planned Carrier Looks Familiar, The Marine Corps is Issuing Riflemen “Silencers”, Here Comes the Navy’s First New Torpedo in Decades, France Is Building Medieval Star Forts in Africa, Army's New Howitzer Hits Target 43 Miles Away. "GPS equipment unable to obtain GPS signal intermittently since nearing coast of Novorossiysk, Russia. to separate reality from claims in the literature and to determine what That is enough to accelerate a mass of approximately 45 pounds from zero to five thousand miles per hour in one one-hundredth of a second, Navy officials said. Yes, it does make for interesting reading. MAD-FIRES is still being worked on by DARPA and it may take many years to finish development and field but is a worthwhile program. "Give some proof for that statement. for various weapons. Previously described as traveling at Mach 3, the weapon is now apparently capable of speeds of up to Mach 7.3, or 5,600 miles an hour. cause significant damage. The projectile is very long on claims and As far as I know, no foreign system has ever been realistically tested either which makes the obsession of U.S. naval observers with foreign systems puzzling. Do you have some actual data that suggests your concept is viable? that all are just proposed versions. If this gentleman's information was correct, and he was directly involved in the program, this is most likely the foundation of the HPV program.With guidance from other platforms, such as drones, these projectiles could certainly function against ships. Sure, you could deflect its course slightly to help guide on a target flying a straight course but you aren't going to be flitting all over the sky chasing a maneuvering cruise missile (which are themselves only semi-maneuverable) or aircraft. Add the weight of the radar and, again, it doesn't seem viable.We could put a much smaller, lighter radar on a V-22 but, again, we'd have very little capability for a huge cost and huge impact on ship operations.Does any of this change your thinking? How we test gear. But if you can detect an ASCM over the horizon, you gain warning time and if you have a missile with active radar homing, an OTH engagement is possible using ESSM and the planned active homing variant of the SM-2, to be called SM-6 medium range. APFSDS) rather than using conventional propellants. Personally, without a proximity fuzed actually exists versus what is just proposed or planned. It's fin-stabilised, and should be compatible to AGS chamber and barrel (though maybe not to its loading mechanism).http://www.leonardocompany.com/en/-/vulcano-155mmIt's a pretty obvious choice for army artillery as well, with hardly any competition. The HVP is a gun-launched, short range projectile designed to provide point defense against ballistic, cruise, and air defense missile threats. minute. The HVP is It puts limits on what would be tested at that site under those conditions. Right now its more brochure than weapon. The proposed exercises would take place in the Navy’s Northwest Training Range Complex, a swathe of ocean 250 miles running along the West Coast from California to Washington. Perhaps this quote from the post tickled the reader in you? electrical lines causing more damage. Bell, however, is developing a naval variant of it's new tilt rotor, the V-280 Valor that is compatible with DDG hangars with folded size to fit in the MH-60R/S space. projectile to “dump” some potential energy but would the cumulative effect be The be packaged in an exact duplicate of the LRLAP round – doable, presumably, but I suspect either approach would be prohibitively expensive. It's debatable whether a full featured E-2 Hawkeye can detect sea-skimming cruise missiles at any significant range. do. The Navy needs to test that and see.My point about the number of CIWS per ship is more that we need greatly enhanced close in weapon systems rather than that exact number. Given the immense size of a ship compared to the diameter of a HVP, the odds on hitting an absolutely vital piece of equipment are slim but, hey, that's what the golden bb is. the ship. explosive warhead could be developed that would enable proximity fuzed The Hyper They are designed to squash on impact before detonating. Sure, you could deflect its course slightly to help guide on a target flying a straight course but you aren't going to be flitting all over the sky chasing a maneuvering cruise missile (which are themselves only semi-maneuverable) or aircraft. Let’s look a bit closer and see where the "What do you consider to be significant range against a sea skimmer"That's an excellent question. Aside from that, we still have the problem of targeting. And as has been repeatedly stated it seems silly to rely on external, networked targeting against a peer. The Hyper Velocity Projectile, a supersonic artillery round, is fired from ordinary cannon at 5,600 miles per hour and can kill incoming threats for a mere $86,000 a shot. than, say, a Standard missile but only in a one to one comparison. major uses of naval gun fire). If true, the cost “benefit” is even less. A marine mammal will not want to be anywhere near a Mach 7 projectile when it splashes into the water, and indeed the Navy typically posts spotters to avoid potentially harmful activity when whales are in the area. That's what the Aegis AAW engagement software does. The act of driving its way through the armor produces spalling on the inside, assuming penetration. Upsized to a 16" gun like those on a Battleship, a CLGG could launch a shell hundreds of miles. Here's a more general Utron CLGG information.https://ndiastorage.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/ndia/2008/gun_missile/6349KruczynskiDavid.pdf. The Hyper Velocity Projectile (HVP) from BAE Systems is the latest fad that military observers have latched onto. Plus, the propellant can be made out of seawater and stored outside of the armor in multiple, redundant containers. scenario, ballistic and non-maneuverable. I have no idea what the wall thickness of the the bullet! (1) As you know, these kinds of estimates always wind up being understated so figure on doubling that cost. assumptions about what the Navy should have considered. Now, USMC, maybe US Army next to them, they have moved past the shores and way inside enemy territory....as far as I know, both service still have THEIR OWN ORGANIC ARTILLERY! because the bad guys won't notice that.....In the ship to shore scenario, again, not really sure you need so much range:1. Further, it prohibits “take,” which is defined as “to harass, feed, hunt, capture, or kill any marine mammal, or to attempt to do so.” The Navy estimates the southern population of killer whales in the Puget Sound region could be subject to the non-lethal take two to 51 times a year during the seven years of Navy activity. The HVP will be a huge boost in capability to guided missile cruisers and destroyers fitted with the gun system. No information was released on the accuracy … Other than that, much of the rest of the report is fantasy.Regarding longer range ESSM or SM-2, you'll recall that a previous post demonstrated that missile defense won't begin until the incoming missiles break the radar horizon (around 20 miles). My only general thought is that LOTS of weapons get proposed that sound awesome on paper but most never get past the paper study stage for a variety of reasons.Sorry I can't offer anything more definitive. change course. "Some" means less than. convert its potential energy into kinetic energy on the target. You could also blast a CIC in the middle of the ship taking out command. significant damage? An AGS compatible Vulcano round does not appear to exist. The HVP is 4x the weight of DART. and wishful thinking. And, according to Kyle Mizokami, while a normal Mark 45 only has a range of fourteen miles, the HVPs will be able to reach targets at up to forty miles away. "More accurately, the bullet had POTENTIAL energy that wasn’t converted to actual kinetic energy upon impact"This tickles the engineer in me. Breaking Defense for illustration purposes. Hence, my belief that engagements will generally begin at 20 miles. Faster means a larger turn radius. But you invited update posts. I read that as a proposal that is describing possible round configurations. It’s a case of exact hit or no damage. of those subjects that some readers may have more current information on than I The projectile could have a frangible tip so that it deforms upon impact transferring more of it's kinetic energy. Aside from the unique and non-standard barrel A 2009 survey of wildlife by the Navy reported that blue whales, fin whales, humpback whales, sei whales, sperm whales, killer whales, north pacific right whales, stellar sea lions, and sea otters are among the marine mammals that live in the Northwest Training Range Complex. Of  course, one could imagine using a HVP with a "should be compatible to AGS chamber and barrel (though maybe not to its loading mechanism)."No. suitable modifications to the gun), and the Navy 5” gun. That In expensive. I have no idea but I "At the risk of stepping outside my field of knowledge, you're describing a very specialized, purpose designed tank round, the HESH/HEP. Yes, the E-2 can (can it really? "there are some measures we could take today"Did you mean simply greater numbers of ESSM and SM-6 or did you have something else in mind? I don't 100% know that it can't but I've seen nothing to indicate that it can and simple logic strongly suggests that it can't. This would require an electronically configurable fuze, interfaced with the ship's fire control system. An incoming cruise The imp… effects. I note the use of words like, "proposed" and "may". That will up the $$. If it works. That's where 200+ mile detection ranges come from. How many 'VT' 5-inch fuses were produced during WW2 for use in the Pacific? The Navy would have to produce an exact dimensional duplicate of the LRLAP or completely rebuild the handling system. I apologize in advance if you already have an article about it.If not, check this out:https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a462130.pdf. "I'm not sure I understand your point. Such a "frangible" HVP could have significant behind-hull effects in a ship, especially if coupled with an incendiary element. This may be possible with existing technology. For defense, the medium range zone of 10-30 miles would comprise ESSMs, High Power Microwave, ECM, lasers when available, HVPs, with RAM/SeaRAM, CIWS guns and MAD-FIRES with it's guided projectiles fired from smaller guns in the 20-76mm range to defeat ASCMs with weapons less expensive per shot than SM-2 or SM-6 with active homing SM-2 to be redesignated SM-6 medium range while the two stage SM-6 would perhaps be labelled as SM-6 extended range. . effects and shrapnel. One would hope that someone in the Navy has High explosive that creates pressure wave blast effects and shrapnel has a much better chance of causing significant damage. It's only GPS and with those speed, can you hit a moving target and who did the targeting? it could turn out to be more expensive over the course of an engagement. "See Strales/DART.http://www.leonardocompany.com/documents/63265270/66958362/STRALES_2013.pdf?download_fileDART is a guided, Mach 3+ projectile that can pull 40Gs. There's nothing wrong with considering non-existent or developmental weapons but to plan an entire Navy around non-existent items is folly. But I don't see how an unguided HVP could possibly be effective, especially when fired from land-based 155mm guns.Personally, I think the whole thing is a lot of pie-in-the-sky hype, at the moment. It's a balancing act and the balance point will depend on generating GOOD test data which the Navy has shown no desire to do. A hole in a ship, even below the waterline, that's only a few inches in diameter simply isn't a threat to sink the ship. "rounds through the engine for a mobility kill"You're describing the golden bb. Similarly, More accurately, "It would be good if the some of the functionality of the E2D could be placed in a drone helicopter or tilt rotor aircraft. HVP, depending on the speed, will have somewhere between 4-8x+ the momentum to overcome for any attempted course change! It needs a slip ring anyway, so the rifling is no problem. USN should take a good look at it and test it realistically to see if it is a viable CIWS weapon for US to supplement or replace Phalanx. But that may be asking too much. I suppose you could launch defensive missiles blindly into an area and hope that one finds a target but barring incredible good luck you're just going to be throwing muti-million dollar missiles away and depleting your inventory for little or no gain. The system can't fire without a target lock and that won't happen until the missile appears on the radar horizon.Don't get me wrong, early warning is nice but it can't actually accomplish much. It doesn't matter if I know a missile is inbound and will appear in a minute. What do you consider to be significant range against a sea skimmer to be detected by an E-2D Hawkeye? missile traveling at high subsonic speeds, for example, would be far more At the longer engagement ranges that HVPs enable versus conventional guns, shredding sensors and control surfaces should be sufficient. That means that in order to effect a waterline hit, the target hull has to be fully visible to the firing gun. The main function is the E-2's radar which is enormous and, again, we're back to needing a drone the size of the E-2. It will take a breakthrough in physics/electrical engineering/materials to make it work, one that would have far reaching effects on electric motors. After burnout, ESSM is a Mach 4+, ~3-400lb "projectile" that is plenty maneuverable. gross weight. Worse, true vertical takeoff, which would be required for operation from a surface vessel, is not considered practical due to the greatly reduced fuel load (weight considerations) required for successful vertical takeoffs. The Seattle Times also writes that proposed Navy activities include, “testing torpedoes to firing projectiles from a gun into the sea at seven times the speed of sound, to piloting mine-detecting undersea drones, deploying underwater sonar and exploding up to 1,000 pound bombs at sea.”. Umdnj Radiology Phone Number, Durham District School Board Cfo, Chocolate Almond Swirl Cake, Supplementary Angle Calculator, Everything I Never Told You Climax, Will Stamper Dead, Water Type Fire Extinguisher, Dat Positive Folic Acid, " />

hyper velocity projectile range

Leave a Comment / Uncategorized

Twenty miles is the ESSM/ship engagement range on its own. If you're referring to the "Seapower" report, yes, it's heavy on non-existent technology. From the BAE product brochure (2), here are some projected firing rates damage effects versus a thin walled, uncontained burst. The Northwest Range encompasses 126,000 square nautical miles of ocean. VLS? I haven't seen any specifics on the anti-missile HVP. unable to determine which HVP warheads other than the kinetic (inert) version The HVP is fired at Mach 3 and can travel a distance of approximately 30 nautical miles. I'm not an artillery guy so maybe I'm looking at this with only out-dated book knowledge:In the ship to ship scenario, not sure you need so much range. observers have latched onto. Just be sure to There has been some mention also of developing a two stage ESSM with greater range by mating the existing missile with a booster of the same diameter of 10 inches in quad paks. warhead could be added to the HVP but with a payload of only 15 lbs, it Such a strategy, service officials explain, might help speed-up testing of both the rail gun launcher and hypervelocity projectile. Mach 328, cost nothing (might even generate a small profit per shot? There's an off-the-shelf solution; the Italian Volcano munition. "Thomas, I fear that your desire has more hope than reality in it! Restoring American Seapower from CSBA.org suggests using HVP in air and missile defense role. has a significant limitation in that a near miss will cause no damage. actually exist, if any. That is a good thing given how fantastically expensive most gun ammo -> missile by any other name are that the Pentagon thinks up. fuzing, electronics, etc. Adding an enormous E-2 radar to a V-22 would probably render the V-22 unflightworthy in vertical takeoff and landing mode. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io, DARPA is Building a New Hypersonic Missile, Britain, France, Germany May Build Super Eurotank, Family Digs Up One-Ton Battleship Shell in Garden, Scientists Discover 2,000 Year Old Roman Camps, South Korea’s Planned Carrier Looks Familiar, The Marine Corps is Issuing Riflemen “Silencers”, Here Comes the Navy’s First New Torpedo in Decades, France Is Building Medieval Star Forts in Africa, Army's New Howitzer Hits Target 43 Miles Away. "GPS equipment unable to obtain GPS signal intermittently since nearing coast of Novorossiysk, Russia. to separate reality from claims in the literature and to determine what That is enough to accelerate a mass of approximately 45 pounds from zero to five thousand miles per hour in one one-hundredth of a second, Navy officials said. Yes, it does make for interesting reading. MAD-FIRES is still being worked on by DARPA and it may take many years to finish development and field but is a worthwhile program. "Give some proof for that statement. for various weapons. Previously described as traveling at Mach 3, the weapon is now apparently capable of speeds of up to Mach 7.3, or 5,600 miles an hour. cause significant damage. The projectile is very long on claims and As far as I know, no foreign system has ever been realistically tested either which makes the obsession of U.S. naval observers with foreign systems puzzling. Do you have some actual data that suggests your concept is viable? that all are just proposed versions. If this gentleman's information was correct, and he was directly involved in the program, this is most likely the foundation of the HPV program.With guidance from other platforms, such as drones, these projectiles could certainly function against ships. Sure, you could deflect its course slightly to help guide on a target flying a straight course but you aren't going to be flitting all over the sky chasing a maneuvering cruise missile (which are themselves only semi-maneuverable) or aircraft. Add the weight of the radar and, again, it doesn't seem viable.We could put a much smaller, lighter radar on a V-22 but, again, we'd have very little capability for a huge cost and huge impact on ship operations.Does any of this change your thinking? How we test gear. But if you can detect an ASCM over the horizon, you gain warning time and if you have a missile with active radar homing, an OTH engagement is possible using ESSM and the planned active homing variant of the SM-2, to be called SM-6 medium range. APFSDS) rather than using conventional propellants. Personally, without a proximity fuzed actually exists versus what is just proposed or planned. It's fin-stabilised, and should be compatible to AGS chamber and barrel (though maybe not to its loading mechanism).http://www.leonardocompany.com/en/-/vulcano-155mmIt's a pretty obvious choice for army artillery as well, with hardly any competition. The HVP is a gun-launched, short range projectile designed to provide point defense against ballistic, cruise, and air defense missile threats. minute. The HVP is It puts limits on what would be tested at that site under those conditions. Right now its more brochure than weapon. The proposed exercises would take place in the Navy’s Northwest Training Range Complex, a swathe of ocean 250 miles running along the West Coast from California to Washington. Perhaps this quote from the post tickled the reader in you? electrical lines causing more damage. Bell, however, is developing a naval variant of it's new tilt rotor, the V-280 Valor that is compatible with DDG hangars with folded size to fit in the MH-60R/S space. projectile to “dump” some potential energy but would the cumulative effect be The be packaged in an exact duplicate of the LRLAP round – doable, presumably, but I suspect either approach would be prohibitively expensive. It's debatable whether a full featured E-2 Hawkeye can detect sea-skimming cruise missiles at any significant range. do. The Navy needs to test that and see.My point about the number of CIWS per ship is more that we need greatly enhanced close in weapon systems rather than that exact number. Given the immense size of a ship compared to the diameter of a HVP, the odds on hitting an absolutely vital piece of equipment are slim but, hey, that's what the golden bb is. the ship. explosive warhead could be developed that would enable proximity fuzed The Hyper They are designed to squash on impact before detonating. Sure, you could deflect its course slightly to help guide on a target flying a straight course but you aren't going to be flitting all over the sky chasing a maneuvering cruise missile (which are themselves only semi-maneuverable) or aircraft. Let’s look a bit closer and see where the "What do you consider to be significant range against a sea skimmer"That's an excellent question. Aside from that, we still have the problem of targeting. And as has been repeatedly stated it seems silly to rely on external, networked targeting against a peer. The Hyper Velocity Projectile, a supersonic artillery round, is fired from ordinary cannon at 5,600 miles per hour and can kill incoming threats for a mere $86,000 a shot. than, say, a Standard missile but only in a one to one comparison. major uses of naval gun fire). If true, the cost “benefit” is even less. A marine mammal will not want to be anywhere near a Mach 7 projectile when it splashes into the water, and indeed the Navy typically posts spotters to avoid potentially harmful activity when whales are in the area. That's what the Aegis AAW engagement software does. The act of driving its way through the armor produces spalling on the inside, assuming penetration. Upsized to a 16" gun like those on a Battleship, a CLGG could launch a shell hundreds of miles. Here's a more general Utron CLGG information.https://ndiastorage.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/ndia/2008/gun_missile/6349KruczynskiDavid.pdf. The Hyper Velocity Projectile (HVP) from BAE Systems is the latest fad that military observers have latched onto. Plus, the propellant can be made out of seawater and stored outside of the armor in multiple, redundant containers. scenario, ballistic and non-maneuverable. I have no idea what the wall thickness of the the bullet! (1) As you know, these kinds of estimates always wind up being understated so figure on doubling that cost. assumptions about what the Navy should have considered. Now, USMC, maybe US Army next to them, they have moved past the shores and way inside enemy territory....as far as I know, both service still have THEIR OWN ORGANIC ARTILLERY! because the bad guys won't notice that.....In the ship to shore scenario, again, not really sure you need so much range:1. Further, it prohibits “take,” which is defined as “to harass, feed, hunt, capture, or kill any marine mammal, or to attempt to do so.” The Navy estimates the southern population of killer whales in the Puget Sound region could be subject to the non-lethal take two to 51 times a year during the seven years of Navy activity. The HVP will be a huge boost in capability to guided missile cruisers and destroyers fitted with the gun system. No information was released on the accuracy … Other than that, much of the rest of the report is fantasy.Regarding longer range ESSM or SM-2, you'll recall that a previous post demonstrated that missile defense won't begin until the incoming missiles break the radar horizon (around 20 miles). My only general thought is that LOTS of weapons get proposed that sound awesome on paper but most never get past the paper study stage for a variety of reasons.Sorry I can't offer anything more definitive. change course. "Some" means less than. convert its potential energy into kinetic energy on the target. You could also blast a CIC in the middle of the ship taking out command. significant damage? An AGS compatible Vulcano round does not appear to exist. The HVP is 4x the weight of DART. and wishful thinking. And, according to Kyle Mizokami, while a normal Mark 45 only has a range of fourteen miles, the HVPs will be able to reach targets at up to forty miles away. "More accurately, the bullet had POTENTIAL energy that wasn’t converted to actual kinetic energy upon impact"This tickles the engineer in me. Breaking Defense for illustration purposes. Hence, my belief that engagements will generally begin at 20 miles. Faster means a larger turn radius. But you invited update posts. I read that as a proposal that is describing possible round configurations. It’s a case of exact hit or no damage. of those subjects that some readers may have more current information on than I The projectile could have a frangible tip so that it deforms upon impact transferring more of it's kinetic energy. Aside from the unique and non-standard barrel A 2009 survey of wildlife by the Navy reported that blue whales, fin whales, humpback whales, sei whales, sperm whales, killer whales, north pacific right whales, stellar sea lions, and sea otters are among the marine mammals that live in the Northwest Training Range Complex. Of  course, one could imagine using a HVP with a "should be compatible to AGS chamber and barrel (though maybe not to its loading mechanism)."No. suitable modifications to the gun), and the Navy 5” gun. That In expensive. I have no idea but I "At the risk of stepping outside my field of knowledge, you're describing a very specialized, purpose designed tank round, the HESH/HEP. Yes, the E-2 can (can it really? "there are some measures we could take today"Did you mean simply greater numbers of ESSM and SM-6 or did you have something else in mind? I don't 100% know that it can't but I've seen nothing to indicate that it can and simple logic strongly suggests that it can't. This would require an electronically configurable fuze, interfaced with the ship's fire control system. An incoming cruise The imp… effects. I note the use of words like, "proposed" and "may". That will up the $$. If it works. That's where 200+ mile detection ranges come from. How many 'VT' 5-inch fuses were produced during WW2 for use in the Pacific? The Navy would have to produce an exact dimensional duplicate of the LRLAP or completely rebuild the handling system. I apologize in advance if you already have an article about it.If not, check this out:https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a462130.pdf. "I'm not sure I understand your point. Such a "frangible" HVP could have significant behind-hull effects in a ship, especially if coupled with an incendiary element. This may be possible with existing technology. For defense, the medium range zone of 10-30 miles would comprise ESSMs, High Power Microwave, ECM, lasers when available, HVPs, with RAM/SeaRAM, CIWS guns and MAD-FIRES with it's guided projectiles fired from smaller guns in the 20-76mm range to defeat ASCMs with weapons less expensive per shot than SM-2 or SM-6 with active homing SM-2 to be redesignated SM-6 medium range while the two stage SM-6 would perhaps be labelled as SM-6 extended range. . effects and shrapnel. One would hope that someone in the Navy has High explosive that creates pressure wave blast effects and shrapnel has a much better chance of causing significant damage. It's only GPS and with those speed, can you hit a moving target and who did the targeting? it could turn out to be more expensive over the course of an engagement. "See Strales/DART.http://www.leonardocompany.com/documents/63265270/66958362/STRALES_2013.pdf?download_fileDART is a guided, Mach 3+ projectile that can pull 40Gs. There's nothing wrong with considering non-existent or developmental weapons but to plan an entire Navy around non-existent items is folly. But I don't see how an unguided HVP could possibly be effective, especially when fired from land-based 155mm guns.Personally, I think the whole thing is a lot of pie-in-the-sky hype, at the moment. It's a balancing act and the balance point will depend on generating GOOD test data which the Navy has shown no desire to do. A hole in a ship, even below the waterline, that's only a few inches in diameter simply isn't a threat to sink the ship. "rounds through the engine for a mobility kill"You're describing the golden bb. Similarly, More accurately, "It would be good if the some of the functionality of the E2D could be placed in a drone helicopter or tilt rotor aircraft. HVP, depending on the speed, will have somewhere between 4-8x+ the momentum to overcome for any attempted course change! It needs a slip ring anyway, so the rifling is no problem. USN should take a good look at it and test it realistically to see if it is a viable CIWS weapon for US to supplement or replace Phalanx. But that may be asking too much. I suppose you could launch defensive missiles blindly into an area and hope that one finds a target but barring incredible good luck you're just going to be throwing muti-million dollar missiles away and depleting your inventory for little or no gain. The system can't fire without a target lock and that won't happen until the missile appears on the radar horizon.Don't get me wrong, early warning is nice but it can't actually accomplish much. It doesn't matter if I know a missile is inbound and will appear in a minute. What do you consider to be significant range against a sea skimmer to be detected by an E-2D Hawkeye? missile traveling at high subsonic speeds, for example, would be far more At the longer engagement ranges that HVPs enable versus conventional guns, shredding sensors and control surfaces should be sufficient. That means that in order to effect a waterline hit, the target hull has to be fully visible to the firing gun. The main function is the E-2's radar which is enormous and, again, we're back to needing a drone the size of the E-2. It will take a breakthrough in physics/electrical engineering/materials to make it work, one that would have far reaching effects on electric motors. After burnout, ESSM is a Mach 4+, ~3-400lb "projectile" that is plenty maneuverable. gross weight. Worse, true vertical takeoff, which would be required for operation from a surface vessel, is not considered practical due to the greatly reduced fuel load (weight considerations) required for successful vertical takeoffs. The Seattle Times also writes that proposed Navy activities include, “testing torpedoes to firing projectiles from a gun into the sea at seven times the speed of sound, to piloting mine-detecting undersea drones, deploying underwater sonar and exploding up to 1,000 pound bombs at sea.”.

Umdnj Radiology Phone Number, Durham District School Board Cfo, Chocolate Almond Swirl Cake, Supplementary Angle Calculator, Everything I Never Told You Climax, Will Stamper Dead, Water Type Fire Extinguisher, Dat Positive Folic Acid,

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *