You will be fine no matter which order you study the material if you put forth a little effort. Which do you take first microeconomics or macroeconomics? The only difference between the two is that one focuses on individual economic activity and the other looks at collective economic activity. My college required calculus only for our advanced econ classes, and even then we didn't use it much. I think that is so because macro studies more interesting subjects for a regular student. . Should you take microeconomics or macroeconomics first? I think I will be taking it with Kaycee Washington. No one of them is dependent in any way on the other, which shouldn't really be the case. Should I take Microeconomics or Macroeconomics? If I did not get Honour Bachelor's Degree and I wrote Honour Bachelor's Degree in resume. 16 Answers. Macro is the economy as the whole, while Micro is the economy in specific. Microeconomics Vs Macroeconomics In Healthcare. It is not necessary to take microeconomics before macroeconomics or vice versa. Wiki Points. Rather, it tries to explain what happens when … Do you do a lot of math in both of them? Hope this helps. thanks
,
If anything, take micro first. Generally speaking, micro is easier than macro . For both courses, you have to be able to read graphs but it doesn't really matter the order in which you take them. It is also on the whole more interesting. 2 years ago. Euzent allows you to redo all your aplia work up until the due date. In this chain of logic, therefore, I recommend doing micro first, in order to get the "yucky," "vegetable" class out of the way. Should I take Microeconomics first or Macroeconomics first? Either way, both are probably introductory level courses...you won't be expected to already know a ton! I honestly am not too savvy, nor am I too interested on economics. Basically, it doesn't make a difference either way. So which of the two would be easier or more interesting to take? Macro was an awesome class - more fun. I need to take 1 economics course, so I have a choice of macroeconomics or microeconomics. "The General Theory" sought to explain the big ideas of an economic system. I add one note of caution. Micro Economics deals with individual while macro is aggregate concept. Students who have any desire to start their own businesses but are not C&F majors should definitely take this course. Should I take microeconomics or macroeconomic first? Last edited by a moderator: May 2, 2011. Taking macro first wouldn't help at all in micro.
,
Macro is not any more difficult than Micro (for AP purposes), but it is not as completely mathematized.
,
i dont think it matters but most colleges teach micro first. I would recommend taking micro since I think it's more applicable, whereas macro I felt to be too abstract. Are rich people the only People theses days who can send kids to a university ? For me I would study macroeconomics first because its study the overall working component of the the national economy like input,output,Inflation ,and GDP while microeconomics is the study of the Individual components within the economy ,such as household and firms ,supply and demand.studying macroeconomic first seems to be best route as its more intensive and extensive and sort of sets the … The first unit in macro basically sums up all of micro, so having already taken micro helps juuust a little. Micro focuses on the basic, underlying, fundamental principles of economics upon which everything else is built. 2 Antworten. I'm thinking Micro will be easier but I would like to hear from people who've taken both. It was John Maynard Keynes … Lv 6. I've enrolled in a microeconomics class for this upcoming semester. They're completely different. Hi! I'm currently taking macroeconomics, which involves the economy as a whole. Though a lot of institutions insist you take macro first. Anonymous. Doesn't matter. If you don't understand the basics of eocnomics after your first semester or course, then take another economics class - it will click at some point. Relevance. 4 Answers. Get your answers by asking now. That way, the principles of economics can be learned on an individual level, before being applied to the wider society and world. If you have the option to take both AP Macroeconomics and AP Microeconomics, then do it! He is doing real well however there is alot of homework.. Nonetheless, if you take macro first you will still be able to understand it, but you will have a better understanding of the hows and whys if you take micro first. Lv 4. and econometrics in 1st and Macro later. I will be beginning my first semester in college, and I was wondering which economics class I should take first. Anonymous. Microeconomics involves concepts you do use, but require a bit more thought to realize they are there most times. Relevanz. Is there an officially recommended path for taking Microeconomics and Macroeconomics? miladybc. He suggests that we should go back to the way Samuelson did it in 1948 — macroeconomics first, then micro. 3. My suggestion, to understand the subject take micro.
,
Nevertheless, if you take macro first you class may fly through the basic introductory concepts in order to get to National accounting, AD/AS etc. Which economics class should I take first, Microeconomics or Macroeconomics? Hey everyone! I have to take both for my degree, and I have never taken an economics course before. AP Gov is more like your traditional social studies class. Macroeconomics first came about when John Maynard Keynes wrote "The General Theory" in the 1930s. 0 1. I’m in college and I have to choose between taking either micro or macro over the summer and I don’t know which one to take. It really does not matter. Macro is the economy as the whole, while Micro is the economy in specific. Lv 6. Should I apply to university before sending official transcripts? Relevance. It should be clear by now that economics covers a lot of ground. Which do you think is more interesting or useful? micro) to understand these concepts; in fact, I'd recommend against it. It does not matter. Ultimately, the ease of the course will depend on your professor and how well they can get you engaged and interested, so ask some students who've taken both as to the styles of both teachers. ... You can more readily find real world analogies for macroeconomics than for microeconomics and thus understand it better. I will be beginning my first semester in college, and I was wondering which economics class I should take first. Close. Answer Save. While some others recommend just the opposite. 0 0. Because of the deeper diving required to relate to it, it's often seen as the more difficult. Follow 19203. Which do you recommend taking first? Which should I take first: Macroeconomics or Microeconomics? That is, the whole is the sum of its parts. I'm majoring in Elementary Education. I blatantly contradicted myself, and as such offer no help to you at all. Hi . Still have questions? Archived. Basic economic theories on human wants, law of demand, marginal utility analysis dealing with human satisfaction and consumption, laws of production and distribution are all explained in micro economics. never had micro, but i'd say that if you're good at NOT overthinking things and at getting broad ideas, you should start with macro. Is there a better order in taking them? Most math you'll find is pretty straightforward, and is often more conceptual in nature to show relationships (i.e. I need to either take macroeconomics or microeconomics in college next semester. Posted by 1 year ago. Learning to think from t he economic perspective can improve your reasoning skills and life skills . Lv 4. I think that's a common order. Hello - I am a university student majoring in Business Administration and I am required to take both Macro and Microeconomics, at the introductory level, for my degree. microeconomics. contestant, Trump reportedly considers forming his own party, Why some find the second gentleman role 'threatening', Pence's farewell message contains a glaring omission, Fox News fires key player in its election night coverage. I took Macro first because my school goes more in depth about supply/demand in macro, and in micro they expect you to already know about supply/demand. Lv 7. Macroeconomics is the application of microeconomic thinking and principles to a new commodity: money. An undergraduate degree in economics is a brown and an MA is arguably the black. How do you think about the answers? Instructors usually assume that students have some background of microeconomics already when they take Macroeconomics. I'm only a freshmen so I have time so its not a matter of that. should i take microeconomics, macroeconomics and econometrics all together in one semester? Should I take Microeconomics first or Macroeconomics first? intro. microeconomics and macroeconomics, which one should i start first? Click to expand... Andy Borchers, May 2, 2011 #4. It focuses on broad issues such as growth, unemployment, inflation, and trade balance. The first 10-20% of macro and micro overlap with each other but then they diverge quite heavily. Yes,you should take microeconomics before taking macroeconomics.This is because in order to understand macroeconomics which involves household and firms,you need to understand utility maximization problems facing these agents.Microeconomics will help you to learn a bout optimization,decisions of individuals such as workers and firms such as monopoly.Once you have … Find out how and why mathematics are used in microeconomics, what its limitations are and the kinds of math skills that economics students should have. My son is taking Macroeconomics with Euzent.. Its a web class and uses aplia for online homework. 5 Answers. Take whichever best fits your schedule. 0.
,
my school only offers macro b/c apparently, my school thinks it's more "basic"
You will be fine no matter which order you study the material if you put forth a little effort. Which do you take first microeconomics or macroeconomics? The only difference between the two is that one focuses on individual economic activity and the other looks at collective economic activity. My college required calculus only for our advanced econ classes, and even then we didn't use it much. I think that is so because macro studies more interesting subjects for a regular student. . Should you take microeconomics or macroeconomics first? I think I will be taking it with Kaycee Washington. No one of them is dependent in any way on the other, which shouldn't really be the case. Should I take Microeconomics or Macroeconomics? If I did not get Honour Bachelor's Degree and I wrote Honour Bachelor's Degree in resume. 16 Answers. Macro is the economy as the whole, while Micro is the economy in specific. Microeconomics Vs Macroeconomics In Healthcare. It is not necessary to take microeconomics before macroeconomics or vice versa. Wiki Points. Rather, it tries to explain what happens when … Do you do a lot of math in both of them? Hope this helps. thanks
,
If anything, take micro first. Generally speaking, micro is easier than macro . For both courses, you have to be able to read graphs but it doesn't really matter the order in which you take them. It is also on the whole more interesting. 2 years ago. Euzent allows you to redo all your aplia work up until the due date. In this chain of logic, therefore, I recommend doing micro first, in order to get the "yucky," "vegetable" class out of the way. Should I take Microeconomics first or Macroeconomics first? Either way, both are probably introductory level courses...you won't be expected to already know a ton! I honestly am not too savvy, nor am I too interested on economics. Basically, it doesn't make a difference either way. So which of the two would be easier or more interesting to take? Macro was an awesome class - more fun. I need to take 1 economics course, so I have a choice of macroeconomics or microeconomics. "The General Theory" sought to explain the big ideas of an economic system. I add one note of caution. Micro Economics deals with individual while macro is aggregate concept. Students who have any desire to start their own businesses but are not C&F majors should definitely take this course. Should I take microeconomics or macroeconomic first? Last edited by a moderator: May 2, 2011. Taking macro first wouldn't help at all in micro.
,
Macro is not any more difficult than Micro (for AP purposes), but it is not as completely mathematized.
,
i dont think it matters but most colleges teach micro first. I would recommend taking micro since I think it's more applicable, whereas macro I felt to be too abstract. Are rich people the only People theses days who can send kids to a university ? For me I would study macroeconomics first because its study the overall working component of the the national economy like input,output,Inflation ,and GDP while microeconomics is the study of the Individual components within the economy ,such as household and firms ,supply and demand.studying macroeconomic first seems to be best route as its more intensive and extensive and sort of sets the … The first unit in macro basically sums up all of micro, so having already taken micro helps juuust a little. Micro focuses on the basic, underlying, fundamental principles of economics upon which everything else is built. 2 Antworten. I'm thinking Micro will be easier but I would like to hear from people who've taken both. It was John Maynard Keynes … Lv 6. I've enrolled in a microeconomics class for this upcoming semester. They're completely different. Hi! I'm currently taking macroeconomics, which involves the economy as a whole. Though a lot of institutions insist you take macro first. Anonymous. Doesn't matter. If you don't understand the basics of eocnomics after your first semester or course, then take another economics class - it will click at some point. Relevance. 4 Answers. Get your answers by asking now. That way, the principles of economics can be learned on an individual level, before being applied to the wider society and world. If you have the option to take both AP Macroeconomics and AP Microeconomics, then do it! He is doing real well however there is alot of homework.. Nonetheless, if you take macro first you will still be able to understand it, but you will have a better understanding of the hows and whys if you take micro first. Lv 4. and econometrics in 1st and Macro later. I will be beginning my first semester in college, and I was wondering which economics class I should take first. Anonymous. Microeconomics involves concepts you do use, but require a bit more thought to realize they are there most times. Relevanz. Is there an officially recommended path for taking Microeconomics and Macroeconomics? miladybc. He suggests that we should go back to the way Samuelson did it in 1948 — macroeconomics first, then micro. 3. My suggestion, to understand the subject take micro.
,
Nevertheless, if you take macro first you class may fly through the basic introductory concepts in order to get to National accounting, AD/AS etc. Which economics class should I take first, Microeconomics or Macroeconomics? Hey everyone! I have to take both for my degree, and I have never taken an economics course before. AP Gov is more like your traditional social studies class. Macroeconomics first came about when John Maynard Keynes wrote "The General Theory" in the 1930s. 0 1. I’m in college and I have to choose between taking either micro or macro over the summer and I don’t know which one to take. It really does not matter. Macro is the economy as the whole, while Micro is the economy in specific. Lv 6. Should I apply to university before sending official transcripts? Relevance. It should be clear by now that economics covers a lot of ground. Which do you think is more interesting or useful? micro) to understand these concepts; in fact, I'd recommend against it. It does not matter. Ultimately, the ease of the course will depend on your professor and how well they can get you engaged and interested, so ask some students who've taken both as to the styles of both teachers. ... You can more readily find real world analogies for macroeconomics than for microeconomics and thus understand it better. I will be beginning my first semester in college, and I was wondering which economics class I should take first. Close. Answer Save. While some others recommend just the opposite. 0 0. Because of the deeper diving required to relate to it, it's often seen as the more difficult. Follow 19203. Which do you recommend taking first? Which should I take first: Macroeconomics or Microeconomics? That is, the whole is the sum of its parts. I'm majoring in Elementary Education. I blatantly contradicted myself, and as such offer no help to you at all. Hi . Still have questions? Archived. Basic economic theories on human wants, law of demand, marginal utility analysis dealing with human satisfaction and consumption, laws of production and distribution are all explained in micro economics. never had micro, but i'd say that if you're good at NOT overthinking things and at getting broad ideas, you should start with macro. Is there a better order in taking them? Most math you'll find is pretty straightforward, and is often more conceptual in nature to show relationships (i.e. I need to either take macroeconomics or microeconomics in college next semester. Posted by 1 year ago. Learning to think from t he economic perspective can improve your reasoning skills and life skills . Lv 4. I think that's a common order. Hello - I am a university student majoring in Business Administration and I am required to take both Macro and Microeconomics, at the introductory level, for my degree. microeconomics. contestant, Trump reportedly considers forming his own party, Why some find the second gentleman role 'threatening', Pence's farewell message contains a glaring omission, Fox News fires key player in its election night coverage. I took Macro first because my school goes more in depth about supply/demand in macro, and in micro they expect you to already know about supply/demand. Lv 7. Macroeconomics is the application of microeconomic thinking and principles to a new commodity: money. An undergraduate degree in economics is a brown and an MA is arguably the black. How do you think about the answers? Instructors usually assume that students have some background of microeconomics already when they take Macroeconomics. I'm only a freshmen so I have time so its not a matter of that. should i take microeconomics, macroeconomics and econometrics all together in one semester? Should I take Microeconomics first or Macroeconomics first? intro. microeconomics and macroeconomics, which one should i start first? Click to expand... Andy Borchers, May 2, 2011 #4. It focuses on broad issues such as growth, unemployment, inflation, and trade balance. The first 10-20% of macro and micro overlap with each other but then they diverge quite heavily. Yes,you should take microeconomics before taking macroeconomics.This is because in order to understand macroeconomics which involves household and firms,you need to understand utility maximization problems facing these agents.Microeconomics will help you to learn a bout optimization,decisions of individuals such as workers and firms such as monopoly.Once you have … Find out how and why mathematics are used in microeconomics, what its limitations are and the kinds of math skills that economics students should have. My son is taking Macroeconomics with Euzent.. Its a web class and uses aplia for online homework. 5 Answers. Take whichever best fits your schedule. 0.
,
my school only offers macro b/c apparently, my school thinks it's more "basic"
Here's what I did (loved economics, got a 5 on both tests).
,
Took 1 semester of Macroeconomics. Econometrics is going to be a math class, not a theory class (lots of statistics). For my Business degree, I am required to take both Macro and Micro and I was told that I have the option of selecting which course to take first. 9 years ago. Relevance. Favorite Answer. I've taken both Macro and Micro, and it really is a whimsical decision. I know what the difference between them is but I was wondering is one easier than the other? Rather, it tries to explain what happens when … Randy. However, through my own research, I have been finding that many recommend taking Micro first as the concepts in Micro serve as the basis for Macro and make it easier to understand overall. miladybc. Gregg DesElms. Thanks for the A2A, Anonymous Quoran. If you were to split it up, I would take Micro first, then Macro and Econometrics afterwards. or is it too much? NorCal Active Member. ? In hindsight, macro IS more concerned with the greater picture, and you don't necessarily have to start from the specifics (a.k.a. In case it’s not obvious, intro to microeconomics is the yellow belt, and intermediate micro is the green at best. Macro is a great introduction to micro, although micro is (in my opinion) the more difficult of the two - you may find yourself wishing you were back in macro. Because of this inherent familiarity, it is often considered the easier of the two courses. 1 decade ago. Or does it not matter? I took Micro first, it probably makes sense because you learn about the smaller scale i.e. 5 Answers. 0 0. ect5150. Relevance. Microeconomics focuses more on basic theories of supply and demand and how businesses decide how much of something to produce and how much to charge for it. Macroeconomics since you never taken any economic course before. I'm going to have some difficult courses so I want to choose the one that will be easier and require less time. I need to either take macroeconomics or microeconomics in college next semester. Microeconomics involves concepts you do use, but require a bit more thought to realize they are there most times. But i don't know for economics, is it better to start with micro first or macro? 1 decade ago. Do i have to take macroeconomics before microeconomics in college or it does'nt matter which one is first? Answer Save. One of the basic fallacies in economics is the fallacy of composition. I think it’s important to take Micro first. The authors show that most top-ranked economics departments either do not specify an ordering or require macroeconomics first, while most textbooks present macroeconomics before microeconomics. Microeconomics and macroeconomics refer to the narrower and more broad pictures of a society’s economy respectively. If it's the same teacher, I'd probably default you to macro. Micro was C-A-K-E. and why? Using a national economic education database, they find that students learn more in principles of microeconomics … You can sign in to vote the answer. Microeconomics is economics on an individual basis. I took both micro and macro in high school and I found this to be true. Having said that, microeconomics does not try to answer or explain what forces should take place in a market. 1 Answer. Microeconomics was difficult for me, but if you work the problems and read the text, it should be fine. Beste Antwort. However, it does not really matter which one you take first. Microeconomics concentrates more on the graphs and calculations of economics, you will be spending a lot of time on calculating and plotting graphs, while in macroeconomics you will be more busy with the "mathematical" side of economics i.e., formulas and "calculating" estimates of stuff like inflation, price elasticity and in-elasticity etc. These findings support the less conventional view that optimal sequencing in introductory economics requires macroeconomics to be taught before microeconomics. I think it makes more sense to take micro first, then macro. whereas this is a large part of the micro course.
,
You will be fine no matter which order you study the material if you put forth a little effort. Which do you take first microeconomics or macroeconomics? The only difference between the two is that one focuses on individual economic activity and the other looks at collective economic activity. My college required calculus only for our advanced econ classes, and even then we didn't use it much. I think that is so because macro studies more interesting subjects for a regular student. . Should you take microeconomics or macroeconomics first? I think I will be taking it with Kaycee Washington. No one of them is dependent in any way on the other, which shouldn't really be the case. Should I take Microeconomics or Macroeconomics? If I did not get Honour Bachelor's Degree and I wrote Honour Bachelor's Degree in resume. 16 Answers. Macro is the economy as the whole, while Micro is the economy in specific. Microeconomics Vs Macroeconomics In Healthcare. It is not necessary to take microeconomics before macroeconomics or vice versa. Wiki Points. Rather, it tries to explain what happens when … Do you do a lot of math in both of them? Hope this helps. thanks
,
If anything, take micro first. Generally speaking, micro is easier than macro . For both courses, you have to be able to read graphs but it doesn't really matter the order in which you take them. It is also on the whole more interesting. 2 years ago. Euzent allows you to redo all your aplia work up until the due date. In this chain of logic, therefore, I recommend doing micro first, in order to get the "yucky," "vegetable" class out of the way. Should I take Microeconomics first or Macroeconomics first? Either way, both are probably introductory level courses...you won't be expected to already know a ton! I honestly am not too savvy, nor am I too interested on economics. Basically, it doesn't make a difference either way. So which of the two would be easier or more interesting to take? Macro was an awesome class - more fun. I need to take 1 economics course, so I have a choice of macroeconomics or microeconomics. "The General Theory" sought to explain the big ideas of an economic system. I add one note of caution. Micro Economics deals with individual while macro is aggregate concept. Students who have any desire to start their own businesses but are not C&F majors should definitely take this course. Should I take microeconomics or macroeconomic first? Last edited by a moderator: May 2, 2011. Taking macro first wouldn't help at all in micro.
,
Macro is not any more difficult than Micro (for AP purposes), but it is not as completely mathematized.
,
i dont think it matters but most colleges teach micro first. I would recommend taking micro since I think it's more applicable, whereas macro I felt to be too abstract. Are rich people the only People theses days who can send kids to a university ? For me I would study macroeconomics first because its study the overall working component of the the national economy like input,output,Inflation ,and GDP while microeconomics is the study of the Individual components within the economy ,such as household and firms ,supply and demand.studying macroeconomic first seems to be best route as its more intensive and extensive and sort of sets the … The first unit in macro basically sums up all of micro, so having already taken micro helps juuust a little. Micro focuses on the basic, underlying, fundamental principles of economics upon which everything else is built. 2 Antworten. I'm thinking Micro will be easier but I would like to hear from people who've taken both. It was John Maynard Keynes … Lv 6. I've enrolled in a microeconomics class for this upcoming semester. They're completely different. Hi! I'm currently taking macroeconomics, which involves the economy as a whole. Though a lot of institutions insist you take macro first. Anonymous. Doesn't matter. If you don't understand the basics of eocnomics after your first semester or course, then take another economics class - it will click at some point. Relevance. 4 Answers. Get your answers by asking now. That way, the principles of economics can be learned on an individual level, before being applied to the wider society and world. If you have the option to take both AP Macroeconomics and AP Microeconomics, then do it! He is doing real well however there is alot of homework.. Nonetheless, if you take macro first you will still be able to understand it, but you will have a better understanding of the hows and whys if you take micro first. Lv 4. and econometrics in 1st and Macro later. I will be beginning my first semester in college, and I was wondering which economics class I should take first. Anonymous. Microeconomics involves concepts you do use, but require a bit more thought to realize they are there most times. Relevanz. Is there an officially recommended path for taking Microeconomics and Macroeconomics? miladybc. He suggests that we should go back to the way Samuelson did it in 1948 — macroeconomics first, then micro. 3. My suggestion, to understand the subject take micro.
,
Nevertheless, if you take macro first you class may fly through the basic introductory concepts in order to get to National accounting, AD/AS etc. Which economics class should I take first, Microeconomics or Macroeconomics? Hey everyone! I have to take both for my degree, and I have never taken an economics course before. AP Gov is more like your traditional social studies class. Macroeconomics first came about when John Maynard Keynes wrote "The General Theory" in the 1930s. 0 1. I’m in college and I have to choose between taking either micro or macro over the summer and I don’t know which one to take. It really does not matter. Macro is the economy as the whole, while Micro is the economy in specific. Lv 6. Should I apply to university before sending official transcripts? Relevance. It should be clear by now that economics covers a lot of ground. Which do you think is more interesting or useful? micro) to understand these concepts; in fact, I'd recommend against it. It does not matter. Ultimately, the ease of the course will depend on your professor and how well they can get you engaged and interested, so ask some students who've taken both as to the styles of both teachers. ... You can more readily find real world analogies for macroeconomics than for microeconomics and thus understand it better. I will be beginning my first semester in college, and I was wondering which economics class I should take first. Close. Answer Save. While some others recommend just the opposite. 0 0. Because of the deeper diving required to relate to it, it's often seen as the more difficult. Follow 19203. Which do you recommend taking first? Which should I take first: Macroeconomics or Microeconomics? That is, the whole is the sum of its parts. I'm majoring in Elementary Education. I blatantly contradicted myself, and as such offer no help to you at all. Hi . Still have questions? Archived. Basic economic theories on human wants, law of demand, marginal utility analysis dealing with human satisfaction and consumption, laws of production and distribution are all explained in micro economics. never had micro, but i'd say that if you're good at NOT overthinking things and at getting broad ideas, you should start with macro. Is there a better order in taking them? Most math you'll find is pretty straightforward, and is often more conceptual in nature to show relationships (i.e. I need to either take macroeconomics or microeconomics in college next semester. Posted by 1 year ago. Learning to think from t he economic perspective can improve your reasoning skills and life skills . Lv 4. I think that's a common order. Hello - I am a university student majoring in Business Administration and I am required to take both Macro and Microeconomics, at the introductory level, for my degree. microeconomics. contestant, Trump reportedly considers forming his own party, Why some find the second gentleman role 'threatening', Pence's farewell message contains a glaring omission, Fox News fires key player in its election night coverage. I took Macro first because my school goes more in depth about supply/demand in macro, and in micro they expect you to already know about supply/demand. Lv 7. Macroeconomics is the application of microeconomic thinking and principles to a new commodity: money. An undergraduate degree in economics is a brown and an MA is arguably the black. How do you think about the answers? Instructors usually assume that students have some background of microeconomics already when they take Macroeconomics. I'm only a freshmen so I have time so its not a matter of that. should i take microeconomics, macroeconomics and econometrics all together in one semester? Should I take Microeconomics first or Macroeconomics first? intro. microeconomics and macroeconomics, which one should i start first? Click to expand... Andy Borchers, May 2, 2011 #4. It focuses on broad issues such as growth, unemployment, inflation, and trade balance. The first 10-20% of macro and micro overlap with each other but then they diverge quite heavily. Yes,you should take microeconomics before taking macroeconomics.This is because in order to understand macroeconomics which involves household and firms,you need to understand utility maximization problems facing these agents.Microeconomics will help you to learn a bout optimization,decisions of individuals such as workers and firms such as monopoly.Once you have … Find out how and why mathematics are used in microeconomics, what its limitations are and the kinds of math skills that economics students should have. My son is taking Macroeconomics with Euzent.. Its a web class and uses aplia for online homework. 5 Answers. Take whichever best fits your schedule. 0.
,
my school only offers macro b/c apparently, my school thinks it's more "basic"
